Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Univ. salud ; 24(supl.1): 294-300, Sep.-Dec. 2022. tab
Article in English | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1424726

ABSTRACT

Introduction: COVID-19-related stigma towards healthcare professionals negatively influences their job performance and well-being, however, this issue has not been sufficiently investigated. Objective: To determine the frequency and variables associated with COVID-19-related stigma toward health care workers in a university population in Mexico. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study. An online questionnaire was sent to 1,054 students between 18 and 29 years of age. Demographic variables, religiosity, fear of COVID-19 and its association with COVID-19-related stigma-discrimination towards health workers (dependent variable) were analyzed. Bivariate analysis and a generalized linear model were performed to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios. Results: The proportion of high stigma-discrimination was 12.4% and was associated with high fear of COVID-19 RPa= 1.51 (95% CI 1.06 - 2.23). Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of establishing programs to reduce COVID-19-related stigmatization towards healthcare professionals.


Introducción: El estigma relacionado con la COVID-19 hacia los profesionales de la salud influye negativamente en su desempeño laboral y bienestar, sin embargo, este tema no ha sido suficientemente investigado. Objetivo: Determinar la frecuencia y las variables asociadas al estigma relacionado con el COVID-19 hacia los trabajadores de la salud en una población universitaria de México. Materiales y métodos: Estudio transversal. Se envió un cuestionario en línea a 1.054 estudiantes de entre 18 y 29 años. Se analizaron variables demográficas, religión, miedo al COVID-19 y su asociación con el estigma-discriminación hacia el personal de salud relacionado con la COVID-19 (variable dependiente). Se realizó un análisis bivariado y un modelo lineal generalizado para calcular las razones de prevalencia ajustadas. Resultados: La proporción de estigma-discriminación alto fue de 12,4% y se asoció con miedo alto a la COVID-19 RPa=1,51 (IC=95% 1,06-2,23). Conclusión: Los hallazgos destacan la importancia de establecer programas para reducir la estigmatización relacionada con COVID-19 hacia los profesionales de la salud.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Social Behavior , Health , Coronavirus , Students , Health Personnel , Social Stigma , Social Discrimination , Work Performance , COVID-19
2.
Ciênc. Saúde Colet. (Impr.) ; 16(12): 4815-4822, dez. 2011. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-606607

ABSTRACT

Objecto. Explora-se a aplicabilidad da análise por causa múltipla de morte para o estudo do cancro cervicouterino. Métodos. Desenho de mortalidade proporcional para analisar todas as causas consignadas na totalidade dos certificados de morte por cancro cervicouterino de mulheres maiores de 18 anos do Estado de México (367), e 515 certificados de mulheres falecida por outras causas. Resultados. Encontrou-se uma razão de causa básica/múltipla de 2.9 nos certificados de morte, isto é pela cada causa básica encontraram-se 2.9 As mulheres falecidas por cancro cervicouterino morrem cinco anos dantes que as que morrem por outras causas (p<0.05). Ao ajustar as análise por causa múltipla para cancro cervicouterino por idade, escolaridad, estado civil, e direito habiencia, destaca a participação dos tumores malignos de lugares mau definidos como causas contribuintes e condicionantes [OR=14.24 (1.67-121.0) e OR=18.98 (2.28-157.56, respectivamente]; seguido pela diabetes mellitus também como contribuintes e sócias [OR=1.82 (1.02-3.27) e OR=7.78(1.46-41.37)] e a hipertensión arterial sistémica como causa sócia [OR = 3.0 (1.39-6.47)]. Conclusões. Causa múltipla é uma análise adequada para observar as doenças que intervêm, contribuem, condicionan e se associam ao cancro cervicouterino no momento da morte.


Objective. The study explores the applicability of the multiple-cause-of-death analysis for cervical-uterine cancer. Methods. A proportional mortality hazard design and the analysis of all causes of death due to cervical-uterine cancer from 367 death certificates of women older than 18 years of age from the State of Mexico, and 515 age and year adjusted sample of death certificates of women from the same region who died from other causes. Results. A basic multiple cause of death of 2.9 was observed in the death certificates, i.e., for every basic cause there were 2.9 multiple causes. When adjusting the multiple-causes-of-death analysis for cervical-uterine cancer by age, education, marital and insurability status, the most contributing and associated causes of death were malignant tumors from unspecified sites [OR=18.98 (2.28-157.56) and OR=14.25 (1.67-121.0)] respectively; Diabetes Mellitus as a contributing [OR=1.82 (1.02-3.27) and associated cause [OR=7.78 (1.46-41.37], and systemic arterial hypertension as an associated cause [OR=3.00 (1.40-6.47)]. Conclusions. The multiple-cause-of-death analysis is an adequate to observe the diseases that contribute condition and are associated to the cervical-uterine cancer.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Cause of Death , Mexico/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL